Nikon full frame model. Nikon D600 - Budget full frame from Nikon. Important points when shooting Time Lapse

© 2017 site

You have decided to buy digital camera? Let me congratulate you. This is one of better ways punch a gaping hole in the family budget. It is most likely useless to dissuade you, so I will simply tell you how to choose a digital camera so that this choice causes you minimal financial and psychological damage.

Unfortunately, it is impossible to give unambiguous, universal recommendations for choosing a camera for an abstract novice photographer, since the needs of all photographers are different. Different photographic tasks require different equipment. A camera that suits me perfectly may not be right for you. Despite this, I will still try to highlight here specific models of digital cameras that, in my opinion, meet the requirements of the widest range of photographers.

What you should pay attention to

Marketers do not get tired of brainwashing naive amateur photographers with those camera parameters that can be easily measured numerically (resolution, ISO, zoom ratio, etc.), although they just say very little about the suitability of the camera for real shooting outside the walls of a photo store.

The resolution of a camera (more precisely, its matrix) is measured in megapixels (Mp), i.e. in the number of dots that make up the camera's matrix, and hence the images obtained with it. Today, the resolution of digital cameras exceeds the capabilities of their lenses, and, much sadder, far exceeds the capabilities of most photographers shooting with these cameras. Ten megapixels is enough for anyone, and today it is difficult to find a camera with a lower resolution. Instead of resolution, pay more attention to the physical size of the matrix - the larger the size (i.e., the smaller the crop factor of the matrix), the better. Other things being equal, a larger sensor is more sensitive to light, has a greater dynamic range, and is less noisy.

ISO is a standard for the sensitivity of photographic material (in our case, a digital matrix) to light. The maximum ISO value indirectly characterizes the camera's ability to shoot in low light conditions, but we should not forget that increasing the sensitivity inevitably leads to noise. What is the use of the declared by the manufacturer maximum value ISO 102400 if it can't be used in practice because the image will be a solid red and blue mess? Compact cameras with small sensors always behave horribly at high ISOs. SLR cameras look much better, but also require sanity.

Zoom ratio is simply the ratio between the maximum and minimum focal lengths of a zoom lens. For example, a lens with a focal length of 18-55 mm is essentially a 3x zoom (55 ÷ 18 ≈ 3), although the concept of a zoom factor is more often used in relation to fixed lenses of compact cameras. Taken regardless of the focal length, the zoom ratio has no meaning and certainly should not serve as a criterion when choosing a camera or lens, and here's why: firstly, it says nothing about specific focal lengths. For example, two completely different lenses can turn out to be equally 5x zooms: 24-120 mm and 80-400 mm. Secondly, you have to pay for versatility with quality - 30x ultrazooms physically cannot provide decent sharpness, and their aperture ratio is not high; and therefore do not chase zoom lenses with exorbitant multiplicity. A convenient set of focal lengths is much more important than the zoom factor. To compare lenses, it is appropriate to use the concept of equivalent focal length, because it allows you to take into account the difference in the size of the sensors of different cameras.

Digital zoom is not only useless, but even somewhat harmful. Having nothing to do with optics, digital zoom simply stretches part of the image. software tools camera, which creates the illusion of zoom, but leads to a noticeable loss of quality. Similarly, you can enlarge the image in Photoshop.

The most important and most stubbornly ignored parameter when choosing a camera by sellers is ergonomics - how comfortable the camera fits in the hand, how quickly it allows you to respond to changing shooting conditions, how thoughtful the management of the most important settings is and whether menu navigation takes too much time. Convenience is an individual matter. You can finally make sure that a particular camera is right for you only by picking it up.

Some parameters just need to be able to interpret. For example, big weight is not an advantage in itself, but it can indirectly indicate the mechanical strength and reliability of the camera, and the high speed of continuous shooting almost always indicates that the camera is suitable for reportage work.

And one more important tip: never listen to consultants in photo equipment stores. Their goal is to sell you a camera, and preferably at a higher price, not to improve your photographs. Only a practicing photographer can know which camera is really good and which is not.

For more detailed information on what criteria should be followed when choosing a digital camera and optics for it, you can learn from the following articles: "What is a professional camera", "Camera options" and "Criteria for choosing lenses". About what else, besides the camera, the amateur photographer will have to acquire, is described in the article “Starting kit for photographic equipment”.

SLR cameras

Nikon FX

Nikon currently releases five full-frame models: D610, D750, Df, D810 and D5. Camera sales around the world are now falling, and if you decide to buy digital camera, Nikon will definitely prefer this camera to be full-frame - simply because it is more expensive.

Of course, we are all very sad that the poor Japanese capitalists are suffering losses, but do you really need a full frame? The difference in image quality between DX and FX devices is minimal today, and is manifested mainly by a slightly lower level of FX noise when high values ISO.

Canon APS-C

Canon APS-C cameras have a 1.6 crop factor sensor, i.e. slightly smaller than the Nikon DX. Canon cameras are better suited for shooting video, and this is a reason to take a closer look at them if you are interested in video shooting. I myself am skeptical about shooting video on a SLR camera, but you are entitled to your own opinion.

Canon has seven current APS-C format models: 4000D, 2000D, 200D, 800D, 77D, 80D and 7D Mark II.

4000D, 2000D, 200D and 800D are amateur cameras. The Canon EOS 2000D is a great camera for a beginner photographer - small, light and not too expensive. Canon EOS 200D is even more compact, but in this regard, it has only a minimum of external controls, which, however, is partly offset by the presence of a touch screen. Canon EOS 800D is a slightly more advanced, but still amateur model. The Canon EOS 4000D is a cut down (not to say worse) version of the 2000D.

Canon Full Frame

Today Canon releases four full-frame models: 6D Mark II, 5D Mark IV, 5Ds and 1D X Mark II. The Canon EOS 1D C doesn't count because it's designed for video, not photography.

Compact cameras

No compact camera can match a DSLR in speed of operation, and few can match in image quality, but when a camera is required to fit in a pocket, DSLRs are completely unacceptable because of their size.

Obviously, if you only need compactness, without regard to image quality and ergonomics, then the camera built into a mobile phone may well replace a real camera. Another thing is that even the simplest soap dish is still more convenient to shoot than the most advanced smartphone.

By the simplest soap dish, I mean something like Nikon Coolpix A10. This ultra-budget camera costs $150, has a 1/2.3" sensor (crop factor 6), a good universal zoom lens and shoots much better than most phones, and besides, it runs on standard AA batteries, which helps a lot on trips.

The problem is that if a person is satisfied with the quality of the image obtained using a 1 / 2.3 "matrix (well, or 1 / 1.7" for more expensive soap dishes), then in most cases he will be satisfied with the quality that the matrix produces mobile phone- for social networks, any rubbish will do. As for ease of use, a rare smartphone owner will agree to pay extra for a separate device with real buttons. He is accustomed to the touch screen and does not know that in some situations the archaic buttons are much more convenient.

However, fans of extreme recreation and tourism may like one of the protected compacts, say, Olympus Tough TG-5 for $ 500, which has a waterproof shock-resistant case, built-in GPS receiver and thermometer, as well as a small 1 / 2.3-format matrix.

I don’t recommend advanced ultrazoom compacts to anyone for the reason that their matrices are still tiny, but in terms of size and price, ultrazooms are very close to budget DSLRs. It is possible that I do not understand something, but, in my opinion, if the camera looks and costs like a DSLR, but shoots like a cheap soap dish, then this is a bad camera and you should not buy it.

The more expensive ones stand apart compact cameras with large matrices. The idea behind these cameras is to get the best image quality when minimum sizes device.

Editors' Choice - Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II for $650, equipped with a 1" sensor (crop factor 2.7) and a zoom lens with an equivalent focal length of 24-100 mm at f / 1.8-2.8 aperture. Why exactly 1"? After all, there are compact cameras and a larger format, up to full-frame ones? That's how it is, but more and more serious compacts have dimensions that no longer allow us to consider them truly compact. And if the camera ceases to fit in your pocket, is it not better to buy a real SLR instead of it for less money and enjoy life? At the same time, the G7 X and other similar cameras provide image quality quite comparable to DSLRs, but at the same time, they practically do not differ in size from ordinary point-and-shoot cameras.

Mirrorless cameras

In principle, it is difficult for me to recommend one of the mirrorless systems to a novice photographer. Their functional advantages even over the simplest SLR cameras are not quite obvious, and the price of mirrorless cameras is still quite high. A person who switches to a mirrorless system should do it consciously and be well aware of what he is losing and what he is gaining. A classic DSLR always has a better price/performance ratio than a similar class mirrorless camera. The only unconditional advantage of mirrorless cameras is their relative lightness and compactness, for which you actually pay an additional premium.

If you have come to this life, then I would advise you to choose between the Olympus Micro 4/3, Fujifilm X, Sony α and maybe Canon EOS M systems. The Olympus system has the most thoughtful ergonomics and a wonderful variety of lenses, but the Olympus sensor is small (crop factor 2). Sony has both cropped and full frame models, but the choice of lenses leaves a lot to be desired. The Fuji system is the golden mean. The Canon EOS M system can hardly be called mature, but Canon mirrorless compatible (with an adapter) with lenses for SLR cameras EF and EF-S. Mirrorless cameras from other manufacturers are nothing more than compacts with interchangeable lenses and an enlarged matrix. For serious photography, they are of little use.

Thanks for attention!

Vasily A.

post scriptum

If the article turned out to be useful and informative for you, you can kindly support the project by contributing to its development. If you did not like the article, but you have thoughts on how to make it better, your criticism will be accepted with no less gratitude.

Do not forget that this article is subject to copyright. Reprinting and quoting are permissible provided there is a valid link to the original source, and the text used must not be distorted or modified in any way.

IN modern world cameras are gaining more and more popularity. Photography is a new art that everyone can do. With the help of pictures, we convey emotions, feelings, fix the history of our life, as well as the world around us. Most people take pictures for themselves, just capturing something important. But there are also real professionals in taking pictures, they live their photos, and in order to convey the mood as much as possible, they wait for hours for the right moment, go on special trips, chasing a sensual and emotional photo. Millions of sites are created, the main theme of which is photography. People communicate their experiences in this way.

Thanks to its simplicity, this art form is deeply embedded in the hearts of many. And progress does not stand still, and people come up with something new, improve cameras, making the picture better, more natural. Now full-frame cameras are gaining popularity, which carry out good detail, show excellent quality and color gamut.

Briefly about devices

The name of the cameras comes from the phrase "full frame". A full frame is the size of the photosensitive matrix responsible for the quality of the image. The larger the matrix, the better the picture quality will be, the less noise there will be with a lack of light. Cameras most often use a semi-format size, that is, an APS-C 23x15 mm matrix. APS-C is the generally accepted designation for crop factor matrices (truncated size). For full-frame cameras, it is the same size as a 35mm film camera (35x24mm). Pictures taken with a full-frame camera are 1.5 times larger than those taken with a half-format sensor.

What is the popularity?

Film cameras have been around since the 19th century, but why are full-frame cameras only gaining popularity now? The fact is that when the active production of digital cameras began, they most often used smaller matrices due to the too high cost of full-frame sensors. Now such matrices have become more affordable, so the demand for them is growing.

Is such a camera necessary?

Although full-frame photographic equipment has become quite affordable and cheap compared to past decades, many large firms still prefer cameras with a truncated matrix, simply improving and improving them. This begs the question: "Since it's more popular, does it make sense to buy full-frame equipment?"

First, you need to figure out why you need a camera at all. Most often, people buy cameras in order to leave a memory of some significant event in their lives, for example, about a holiday or a pleasant trip. It is clear that in the family archive or in social networks no one will look at the dimensions of the matrix of the camera on which the photo was taken. If you use the camera only for yourself, then you should not spend money, the main thing to remember is that not only quality is valued in photography, but also the composition and the meaning inherent in it.

What about those who make a living from photography? This is the same profession where you need to improve your skills and improve, work on the quality of work, color depth. In fact, many manufacturers have managed to produce non-full-frame models with a resolution of over 16 megapixels, while the quality remains high even at ISO 1600.

Indicators of narrow depth of field (depth of field of the depicted space) have always been hallmark full-frame technique that can create the bokeh effect, but now, using lenses with ultra-fast aperture 1.2, you can achieve the same picture.

At the same time, full-frame cameras are much more expensive than non-full-frame cameras, and they are also heavier and take up more space.

A non-professional person will not notice the difference between cameras with a crop factor and full-frame cameras, therefore, it is up to you to decide whether to buy full-frame cameras, after weighing the pros and cons. Retro lovers appreciated this undertaking, as the film technique fell into the soul of many.

Pros and cons of full frame cameras

As mentioned in the previous paragraph, modern semi-format cameras can compete with full-frame cameras in terms of image quality, size and price. What kind positive sides has a full-frame photographic equipment?

• The size and light sensitivity of the matrix help to create images of very high quality and with good detail.
• Low noise operation, which is good for photographers who, for example, hunt rare animals.
• The presence of continuous shooting, this allows you to catch the natural movement.
• With fast autofocus, you can quickly switch from subject to subject, which will prevent the photo from blurring.

Of course, full-frame cameras also have disadvantages:

• Camera dimensions. Weight and dimensions do not always make it easy to carry equipment, and without a tripod, hands get tired quickly enough.
• Slow shooting speed. Despite fast autofocus and continuous shooting, you still can’t capture the moment instantly.
• The cost of cameras and additional equipment.
• Careful approach to technique and selection of optics. Many full-frame cameras do not accept other brands of lenses.

As we can see, the number of pros and cons of full-frame technology is the same. So, everyone is free to choose, based on their tastes and preferences.

Company "Nikon"

The history of the company began in 1917 in the Japanese city of Tokyo. Since then, Nikon has been one of the leaders in the production of optics and various photographic equipment.

This manufacturer makes cameras for different tastes: there are budget, amateur and professional cameras. Since Nikon is responsible for the quality of its products, even the cheapest cameras up to two thousand rubles have good content for their money. As for very expensive equipment, the price of professional cameras, for example, varies between 200 - 400 thousand rubles. Interestingly, Nikon produces not only photo and video equipment, but also microscopes and other devices necessary in medicine.

Nikon's main competitor has always been and will be Canon, they often share the first place in the ratings best cameras. Both firms are located in Japan, have a similar look and assembly.

What are the features of Nikon? This manufacturer pays great attention to the quality of shooting in low light. Also an advantage is the large size of the sensor, making high-quality photos with a small number of pixels. The company also adds small details that make the job much easier. Nikon, even in the most basic and cheap models, has good autofocus, many modes, an HDR effect (which is not available on all cameras, even Canon).

Everyone chooses a camera according to their taste, and Nikon is one of those companies that has millions of fans around the world. Among its products you can choose good camera which will be convenient and easy to use.

Features of Nikon full-frame cameras

Nikon was one of the first companies to start producing full-frame cameras. And many users of photographic equipment prefer this particular manufacturer. What is the difference between a full-frame Nikon and its counterparts from other brands? Let's try to figure it out.

Firstly, since the company already has experience in creating such equipment, the quality of a Nikon full-frame camera is very much appreciated on the market. Such a device will please with long work. Not many manufacturers can compete in performance with Nikon. Full-frame cameras from their production are characterized by a high resolution of more than 35 megapixels, striking in their detail. And this is very important for amateur photographers.

Secondly, the full-frame Nikon has a lower price compared to Sony and Canon, which cost at least 150 thousand rubles. As for Nikon cameras, professional devices can be found up to 90 thousand.

In the end, the cameras of this company are very affordable. Full-frame Nikon can be found in so many popular stores, you don’t have to constantly look for cameras on various sites, re-buying already used products.

List

When choosing a Nikon camera for yourself, it is worth remembering that this company has its own designations. How to determine which Nikon is full-frame? Let's illustrate with an example. FX is a full-frame Nikon, and DX has a matrix size of 23.6x15.7 mm.

So, below is a list of full-frame Nikon cameras in terms of price and quality.

Nikonists have been waiting for a cheap “full frame” for years. After all, every second photographer is sure that it is a camera with a 24x36 mm sensor that will make his photos masterpieces, and clients will line up for his services. This, of course, will not happen, but cameras with FX sensors do have their undeniable advantages. Therefore, the possession of such a SLR is the very “holy grail” that you must strive for.

The previous most affordable SLR camera, the Nikon D700, cost $3,000 at launch. Only photographers who were already earning a decent living from photography could afford such an amount. And this is only the cost of the “body” itself. Lenses compatible with a full frame sensor also cost quite a lot of money, with the exception of some inexpensive primes such as Nikkor AF 50mm f/1.8D, AF-S 50mm f/1.8G, AF-S 50mm f/1.4G. Therefore, the purchase of such a photographic tool was and remains only a dream for most amateur photographers.

Fingers crossed, every photographer with Nikkor lenses in their case awaited the D600 announcement and pricing announcement. And here it is, Nikon D600. The official price tag is $2100. Those who were waiting for a cost of about $ 1,500 furiously resented Nikon, although she personally did not promise them anything. How this price is justified, we will understand in this review.

Video review Nikon D600:

What will please the outside?

The body of the Nikon D600 is based on magnesium alloy, but some polycarbonate is also used on the front panel. All this is topped with a sauce of all sorts of comfortable rubber bands, buttons, levers and control dials. If you are told that the D600 is a housewife camera due to its small size compared to the Nikon D800, stay away from such people. In terms of dimensions, it is somewhere in the middle between the more compact D7000 and the older brother D800. Moreover, the depth of the case here is the same as in the D800, and even a little more than in the D700. The width and height are only a few millimeters smaller. The battery grip sits in the hand like a glove. Nikon claims the D600's weatherproofing is good, but we haven't had a chance to test it in a sandy desert or in heavy rain. But frost -15 she survived quite successfully. If you do not know, be sure to read the appropriate one on the site.
On the rear panel, under plastic protection, there is a 3.2-inch VGA display with wide viewing angles and excellent color reproduction. Viewing pictures on such a display is a pleasure. You can quickly determine the accuracy of hitting the focus on the target and shake. The control wheels have stops from accidental scrolling and a tractor coating for better grip with your fingers. In addition to the mandatory ones, there are also 2 programmable ones for individual settings. The control and customization capabilities are about the same as in the D7000, that is, you can configure almost everything that you can think of. What's missing is the use of the "OK" button on the selector as a zoom to 100% in view mode. Given that this is a purely software feature, I think Nikon programmers will release firmware with changes in the near future. It is convenient to assign a change of FX / DX modes to the Fn key and, with one touch, get one and a half times longer focal length when it is needed in a full-fledged RAW file.

The left sidewall is dotted with a scattering of inputs and outputs. Here you will find mini USB, HDMI, input for the GPS module and remote control, a port for an external microphone and even headphones. The latter is a step towards the popularization of video shooting with the help of SLR devices. Constantly monitoring the sound level and possible interference is critical to obtaining high-quality video material.

The Nikon D600 has two slots for SD memory cards at once. On one of them you can write JPEG files, on the second - RAW. Or duplicate all the information if certain frames are incredibly important and you doubt the reliability of memory cards.

What's under the hood?

The heart of the Nikon D600 is a 35.9x24mm sensor with a resolution of 24 million pixels. The sensitivity range is from 100 to 6400 units. In extended mode - from 50 to 25600. The latest generation Expeed 3 processor is responsible for processing data from the matrix. This combination of components allows the Nikon D600 to occupy the top positions in the ranking of cameras in its price range with the highest detail and at the same time low noise level at high ISO values. You can safely set Auto ISO with an ISO limit of up to 6400, a shutter speed of 1/160–1/200, and use aperture priority mode exclusively. In the Auto ISO setting, you can set the shutter speed ratio relative to the current focal length. This is incredibly handy when using zoom lenses. Up to a sensitivity of 1600, you are unlikely to ever think about noise reduction at all. 3200-6400 - you can also safely use it, but it's better to use it exclusively in RAW. It is worth saying that the noise reduction and sharpening are adjusted when shooting in JPEG in such a way that they are always in harmony and agreement with each other.
The Nikon D600 autofocus system was inherited from the D7000. On the one hand, this is good - the seven thousandth has a very good focus module. It has 39 points, of which 9 are of the cruciform type. But there is one detail - this module is designed for cropped SLR cameras. What does it threaten? The fact that the entire field for selecting focus points is concentrated in the central part of the frame. Because of this, it is problematic to focus on the eyes of the model without moving the camera itself if tight framing is used. How critical this is, only you can judge. Many people use exclusively the central focus point, then block the focus with a special focus button and crop. The speed and accuracy of autofocus did not cause problems during testing with the Nikkor AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8G, Nikkor AF 50mm f/1.8D and Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.8D lenses. On the other hand, with an autofocus module originally designed for FX cameras, it would be even better.
The overall speed of work and rate of fire deserve special attention. With a fairly large sensor resolution, the D600 shoots at a speed of 5.5 frames per second, which is more than the big brother D800 can afford. At the same time, up to 15 frames in a series are placed in the memory buffer when shooting in RAW and up to 30 in JPEG. The most noticeable drawback of the Nikon D600, which every more or less attentive photographer noticed in a press release, is the minimum shutter speed of 1/4000. This is critical for owners of super fast f/1.2–f/1.8 lenses. In sunny weather, in this case, the minimum ISO 50 and shutter speed 1/4000 may not be enough and you will have to cover your favorite aperture. On the other hand, calculate for yourself how many shots you make per year at such values. There is a problem, but its significance is clearly exaggerated. Among the interesting features worth noting are interval and time-lapse shooting for creating impressive time lapses, advanced HDR shots, Active D-Lighting to increase the dynamic range of shots, and vignetting correction.

There is already a lot of information on the network about the problem with dust on the sensor, which accumulates literally after the first hundred shots. It may not be possible to blow it off with an ordinary pear, since the grains of sand most likely have an oil base and the sensor will need to be cleaned using special cleaners with a solution. This phenomenon will be noticeable only at very closed apertures> f / 11. Photographers who don't shoot macro and very slow shutter speeds know that the best detail on their lenses is still down to f/8, so most people will never know about this problem. Dust stops appearing after about the 1st thousand shots. It seems that the internal mechanical parts are lapped and everything falls into place. So, to attach special importance to this problem is complete insanity, as for me. After 1000 clean and forget once. Well, or wait for deliveries in half a year, when the bug is fixed at the factory at the production stage.

Cinematic abilities

The Nikon D600 is packed with everything a demanding videographer might need - Full HD video recording up to 30fps, high bitrate, manual settings, uncompressed HDMI output, microphone and headphone input, manual volume control.

The bug with the inability to set the aperture in Live View seems to have been inherited by the D600. To correct the aperture, you have to turn off / turn on Live or switch to photo mode and back to video. Infuriates to the point of impossibility, but what we have, we have. We really hope that this will be fixed in the next firmware.

Pictures Gallery:

(Click on the top right corner to view full screen)

Nikon D600 vs Nikon D800:

1. 24MP sensor vs 36MP.
2. 10.5MP in crop mode versus 15.3MP.
3. 39-point AF system with 9 cross sensors vs 51/15.
4. All points are concentrated in the center of the frame against a more even distribution over the entire field of the frame.
5. Faster burst shooting 5.5 vs. 4 fps.
6. More primitive metering.
7. Two slots for SD cards against SD+CF.
8. USB 2.0 vs. USB 3.0.
9. Uses polycarbonate on the front panel against the D800's all-magnesium case.
10. Guaranteed number of shutter releases 150K versus 200K

What we liked:

• Low noise 24MP sensor
• Wide dynamic range of RAW files
• Excellent 3.2″ VGA display
• High-quality video filming
• Headphone and microphone input
• Dust and moisture protection of the case
• Uncompressed HDMI output
• Fast and accurate focusing
• HDR shooting
• 100% coverage of the frame in the viewfinder
• Interval and time-lapse photography
• Vignetting correction function
• Effective Active D-Lighting
• Burst speed and large memory buffer
• Compact and lightweight compared to other FX cameras
• Shooting video and photos in DX mode, and photos in RAW
• Ability to use both FX and DX lenses
• Dual axis virtual horizon

But what's wrong?

• Minimum shutter speed 1/4000
• Focus points are concentrated in the central part
• Inability to set aperture without exiting Live View
• Inability to put on the “OK” key the image magnification up to 100% in playback mode
• Slow autofocus in Live View compared to mirrorless cameras
• No histogram in Live View
• Rapidly accumulating dust on the sensor in the first shipments

What glass to take with Nikon D600?

Full-frame fast zooms are very expensive. Therefore, in case of constraint in finances, one or two fixes can be dispensed with. The cheapest option is the Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.8G for just over $200. It is on the FX camera that it will be the very “correct” fifty dollars, with which you can photograph everything around approximately the way your eyes see it. 50mm is quite versatile in everyday life. You can shoot both portraits and landscapes, and feel normal in cramped indoor conditions. A maximum aperture of f/1.8 + low-noise Nikon D600 full-frame sensor allows you to photograph in almost any lighting conditions. More expensive version The Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.4G costs almost twice as much ($400) and has 2/3 more aperture. If possible, buy it right away. Although its advantages over the f / 1.8 version are not worth a twofold difference in cost.
Last but not least, FX cameras are bought because of the possibility of blurring the background when shooting portraits. An 85mm portrait lens is perfect for this purpose. The Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.8G costs around $500 and will give you the picture that cropped SLR owners can only dream of. The lens is quite compact and has an f/1.8 aperture with a soft pattern. A much more expensive version of the 85 Nikkor AF-S 85mm f / 1.4G has only 2/3 more aperture, but costs 3.5 times more ($1700). The optical design uses a nanocrystalline coating. Whether it is worth overpaying so much for relatively small differences is up to you.
Nikkor AF-S 28mm f/1.8G will be a great addition to a fifty or 85-ke. 28mm provides a moderately wide angle on a full frame without much distortion. At almost $700, this lens should only be purchased if you have a clear understanding of what you want to get. The optical design also uses a nanocrystalline coating.
Nikkor AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8G is one of the best standard fast zooms for full frame cameras. Sharp from an open aperture at all focal lengths, fast autofocus, a minimum of optical defects, large, heavy, beautiful! A must have if you want one single universal lens and are ready to spend $1600 on it. The optical design also uses a nanocrystalline coating.
The Nikkor AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8G is one of the best ultra wide angle lenses ever made. Its resolution at open apertures is greater than the maximum possible resolution of many other wide-angle lenses. If you hide a little, it covers the resolution of any camera that has come out to date. Despite the very wide angle, the level of distortion is also within reasonable limits. The optical design uses a nanocrystalline coating. It is so successful that some put it through an adapter on Canons. It is worth noting that the front lens of the lens is convex, so it is impossible to use polarizing and gradient filters, beloved by landscape painters, with it. The cost is also fantastic - almost $ 2,000.
The Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II is a new generation standard fast telephoto zoom. Nikon embodied in it their best practices in the field of optics and electronics. A group of auxiliary lenses is used to eliminate common defects in lenses and telephoto lenses in particular. The optical stabilizer works very effectively and allows the photographer to shoot at shutter speeds long enough for a telephoto. The price is even more cosmic than that of 14-24 / 2.8 - $ 2100. The optical design also uses a nanocrystalline coating.

Alternative

In fact, the only competitor of the Nikon D600 in the price range around $2000 is the Canon EOS 6D, released around the same time. The price for it at the time of writing this material was $ 400 higher, but should equal after a while. 6D is slightly lighter and thinner. Most likely the grip will be at least a little, but worse. The 20.2-megapixel sensor in 6D loses a little in detail to the D600, but only nominally. IN real life it will be impossible to feel. But 6D has a larger maximum range sensitively and most likely makes less noise in the dark. The 6D is slightly behind the 600 in terms of rate of fire - 4.5 versus 5.5 frames per second. Again, you won't feel it in real life. The autofocus system uses only 11 points versus 39 and only one cross-shaped versus 9 for the D600. But all these points are located more evenly across the field of the frame, so there will be more sense from them by and large. But where the 6D really loses is in the viewfinder coverage of only 97% of the frame versus 100% for the D600. The 6D has one SD slot and no flash, compared to the D600's two and built-in flash. But the 6D has built-in Wi-Fi and GPS modules. In the case of the Nikon D600, you will have to buy additional modules for an additional fee.

Summary

The Nikon D600 is yet to gather a collection of Oscars from the world of photography industry awards. This is the smallest and lightest camera in the Nikon range with a 24x36mm sensor. It contains all the cutting-edge developments of Nikon - excellent photo detail, low noise at high ISO values, fast work and high rate of fire with a capacious memory buffer, nimble and precise system autofocus. In general, a full stuffing in one bottle.

The D600 also has some drawbacks. The more expensive Nikon D800 does not have them. Before buying, it is worth weighing them too, because the amount is not very small - $ 2100, and even more in our area. If you still want to buy a full-frame DSLR, but the D600 is not enough, take a closer look at the Nikon D700. Despite its age, this camera allows you to fully experience all the delights of using a DSLR with a full-frame sensor and costs about $1200-1300 on the secondary market.

Who can advise Nikon D600? - Yes, by and large, to everyone who can afford it. I can hardly imagine the disappointed owner of this camera. The D600 is suitable for both professional tasks, whether it be a studio or a reportage, and for everyday shooting by users who do not make a living from photography.

Video review Nikon D600:

The soldier who does not dream of becoming a general is bad. This truth was written many years ago and does not lose its relevance even now. But there is a slightly different expression among photographers: “It’s impossible not to want a full frame.” But at the same time, the cost of a full frame did not allow every second person to buy such a carcass. In the camp of both Canon's and Nikon's, such cameras were intended for more professional use or for advanced enthusiasts, while it should be borne in mind that professional tools simply cannot be cheap.

It's scary to imagine how much time in total is spent in the world dreaming about a 36x24 frame.

There were terrible legends about the full frame. It was said that the one who picks up such a camera simply will not be able to shoot on anything else, that there is a “Masterpiece” button, and every third shot taken on a full frame will be bought and printed by magazines such as National Geographics, Playboy and Esquire. Many even just went to stores and held such carcasses in their hands in order to feel the holy spirit of real creativity.

But now photo makers are pushing the boundaries and starting to produce cameras that you will not only want, but will be able to afford. And one of these is Nikon D610.

Video review Nikon D610:

Design and ergonomics

Externally, the device most closely resembles the Nikon D600. Same controls, same ports. Go and see his review.

I was too lazy to describe all this, but the evil editor-in-chief said: “Work!”. This is where you have to work.

The basis of the case is magnesium alloy, which protects the camera from external negative influences. A small amount of plastic is still present and can be seen on the front of the device. But at the same time, solidity did not suffer in any way - the carcass feels strong. It has dust and moisture protection, while, of course, it is inferior in level to the D4 master, but you can shoot in light rain or snow without worrying. Even in ten-degree frost, all the functions worked adequately for me, however, for this you need to prepare the camera like this.

The case fits in the hand like a glove, does not slip and does not strive to fall out. On the front side there is a battery handle with a functional wheel for a more comfortable grip and control, an already canonical red stripe, and two function buttons. One is hung with the function of changing the aspect ratio - switching between FX and DX. This is very convenient when you need to get closer to the subject, but the zoom is not enough. Or for a more convenient compositional construction of the frame. On the second one, I personally put an aperture repeater in order to quickly and conveniently assess the depth of field.

In the center is a metal mount, and on the other side is a lens release button, a lever for switching between automatic and manual focusing and a button for changing autofocus modes. Above, on the protruding prism block are the bracketing and opening keys for the built-in flash. This is undoubtedly a plus, because in all models of this class there is usually no flash. Manufacturers believe that people using such a camera will enjoy external sources lighting. This is partly true, but sometimes the built-in puff saves.

On the left side, under rubber plugs, there are connectors for connecting external accessories - Mini USB, HDMI, a port for a GPS module, and a remote control. There are also connectors for an external microphone and headphones, so it is now much easier to control the quality of sound recording.

On the right side, there are still two SD card slots under a plastic cover. Such a solution will allow you to use twice as much memory and forget about worries about lack of space.

The bottom edge is occupied by the battery compartment and tripod socket.

At the top end, everything is familiar. On the left are two mode wheels that are locked with buttons to protect against accidental rotation, while the lower one is responsible for selecting the shooting speed, mirror pre-up, quiet mode, and the upper one for selecting PASM, user saved modes and auto.

On the right is a monochrome display for displaying information, a shutter button with a three-position on / off / backlight lever, video recording, exposure compensation and focus area selection keys. It is worth noting that to control the functions, you need to not only press them, but also hold them while turning the wheel.

In the center above the mount is a hot shoe and a hidden built-in flash.

The rear edge is given over to a fixed 3.2-inch VGA display. Viewing angles and color rendition cause genuine delight and a desire to view pictures right on the spot.

To the left of the display are five buttons: menu, color correction, setup information, zoom in and out. Almost all buttons have two functions. For example, setting information can change white balance, and zooming can change image quality and ISO.

To the right of the screen is an info button, Live View mode framed by a video or photo selection lever, a four-way joystick, an OK button, and a focus point lock lever. Above the screen is a viewfinder with a proximity sensor and diopter adjustment, to the left of it - viewing the gallery and removing. On the right - AE-L / AF-L and the second mode dial.

What's under the hood

Behind the mirror is a 24 MP sensor measuring 36 x 24 mm. The classic narrow film format in digital form. The Expeed 3 processor is responsible for the correct operation. This is enough to ensure highest speed work and forget about any braking or speed problems.

The sensitivity range is from 100 to 6400 units, and in extended mode, an interval from 50 to 25600 ISO becomes available. At the same time, the matrix makes little noise - values ​​\u200b\u200bup to 6400 can be considered working. If you shoot in RAW followed by competent development, then 12800 is quite usable not only for the web, but also for printing in small sizes. Falling details and colored noise are no longer noticeable from a distance of one meter.

For printing from a device in A4 format, oddly enough, almost all values ​​\u200b\u200bare suitable. Up to 6400 ISO, you can get high quality prints even from Jpeg, but after that you should still switch to RAW. 12800, after a competent development, still demonstrates some color noise, but at arm's length, and even more so on the wall, it is difficult to see it. But 25600 is not worth printing even from RAW more than A5. Here you can already see the loss of detail on small textures and noise.

The device's rate of fire is at a height of 6 fps at full resolution in RAW. The buffer is enough for a series of 15 frames, then the camera will shoot endlessly with a frame rate of almost 1 fps. With JPEG, you can practically not worry about the buffer - more than 30 frames will be enough in 99% of cases. Measurements were made with a fast memory card (its review). With slower cards, the results may differ for the worse.

There is also quiet shooting at 3 fps. True, the volume here is an exclusively comparative parameter, but you will obviously attract much less attention.

The dynamic range deserves special praise at all - lights and shadows are worked out correctly and correctly, but if the need arises, you can safely turn on the D-Lighting or HDR extension. High Dynamic Range does not work with RAW and even in RAW+JPEG mode. To activate it, you will always have to switch to JPEG.

autofocus

The autofocus system is inherited, and to it - from the D7000. And I have to say, she's awesome. These are 39 points, of which 9 are cross points. But there is also a minus - the main array is concentrated in the central part of the frame. This means that aiming at the extreme point will be somewhat problematic, as well as at the small one in the center of the frame. For me personally, this was not a problem - I focused, blocked, shifted the camera a little and got a good result. In general, the automatic focusing system works very correctly - quickly, tenaciously, accurately.

These should definitely include the function of shooting Time Lapse Motion, or time-lapse video, as you please. If earlier, to obtain such an effect, it was necessary to spend a lot of time and effort, now we simply select the necessary item, interval and shooting time in the menu. Press "OK" - and we get the output of the finished video in * .mov format. Everything else is not something supernatural - the expansion of the dynamic range, bracketing. That's all we've seen in previous models.

Video capabilities

They are top notch here. FullHD up to 30 fps, high bitrate, flexible sound settings, microphone and headphone connection. But here, as well as almost everywhere at Nikon, a small and annoying bug appears. Well, what the hell am I, buying a carcass for two pieces of bucks, I can’t change the aperture value when shooting video in Live View mode? At the same time, there are no problems with this in the older D800. I'm just shocked that the company, which was the first in the world to implement video shooting in DSLRs, behaves like this.

Nikon D610 vs. Nikon D600

• 6 fps vs 5.5 fps;
• the new model has a quiet continuous shooting;
• fixed some bugs with color correction and white balance;
• from now on, in new models there are no problems with the shutter / mirror unit and there are no oil stains on the matrix. And in the predecessor, this sometimes happened.

Good

• excellent low-noise sensor;
• wide dynamic range in standard mode;
• bright and rich display;
• good level of video quality;
• variety of ports;
• dust and moisture protection;
• adequate operation at low temperatures;
• fast and tenacious focusing;
• viewfinder with 100% frame coverage;
• the presence of time-lapse photography;
• many functions for correcting lens defects;
• slot for two SD memory cards.

Badly

• minimum shutter speed 1/4000;
• crowding of dots in the central part of the frame;
• IMPOSSIBILITY TO CHANGE IRIS IN LIVE VIEW MODE;
• not the fastest autofocus in live view mode;
• the absence of a histogram on the display when sighting through the display.

What glass to take

It is worth saying that in order to unlock the full potential of the matrix installed inside the carcass, it is worth planning the purchase of good and bright optics. At the same time, in conditions of limited finances, you can easily get by with fixes - for example, Nikkor AF-S 50mm F1.8G.

In full frame conditions, this will be exactly the right fifty dollars, a universal lens. Not for nothing that all film cameras were equipped with just such fixes - they can shoot almost all subjects: from architecture and genre, to portrait and landscape. A high aperture will allow you to shoot even in poor lighting conditions. In this case, the photographer will always be able to switch to DX mode and get 75 mm for shooting large portraits.

If there are no funds at all, then for the first time fifty dollars will suffice. His review.

If you have extra funds, you can take. Its cost is about 400 dollars, but the aperture ratio is two-thirds higher.

Nikkor AF-S 85mm F1.8G will good choice for those who like to take portraits. It's compact enough to carry your camera around every day, blurs the background really well, and delivers a soft and beautiful pattern. But its cost is about 500 conventional units. There is also a version with F1.4 aperture, but it's worth it to overpay, decide for yourself, based on the tasks.

The Nikkor AF-S 28mm F1.8G is the right lens for shooting architecture or landscapes. Wide angle, beautiful drawing, low level of distortion for $700 is a good choice.

You can also look at the expensive one - one of the best wide-angles ever created. . Let it be darker, but it will give a better picture. But given the $2,000 price tag, it's worth thrice-thinking if you need one.

- This is a standard fast lens for every day. Sharp, fast, beautiful, heavy, it will allow you to shoot all sorts of scenes, getting good results. It costs a lot - 1600 bucks. .

The Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm F2.8G VR II is a bright telephoto lens for reporters. The built-in stub minimizes lubrication, there are practically no defects, and the price of 2100 conventional units makes you lick your lips. But keep in mind that buying such a whopper is for professional work- when I came to the club with him, I was asked to confirm the accreditation of a journalist.

Alternative

In fact, the only alternative and competitor. The price category is about the same, and even a little cheaper. Its cost now in the vastness of Ukraine starts at $ 1,500. The carcass is lighter and smaller, the sensor slightly loses in detail nominally. In real conditions, you are unlikely to feel the difference. A matrix from a competitor will make a little less noise in the dark, have the same excellent DD and color reproduction. The rate of fire is slightly lower - 4.5 fps versus 6. There are only 11 autofocus points on board with one cross-shaped. But the points are located more evenly across the frame field. The viewfinder loses - only 97% coverage.

Also, the Canon 6D has one memory card slot and no built-in flash. But there are Wi-Fi and GPS modules.

You can, of course, take the Nikon D600 - it will cost a little less - about $ 1,600. But at the same time, you doom yourself to torment about the oil on the matrix and the breakdown of the mirror / shutter. And given the difference of $ 100 with the next generation, I think it's not worth it.

Summary

I am sure that Nikon D610, despite a number of small disadvantages, will easily win the love of many photographers. This is the smallest and most affordable full-frame DSLR from manufacturers, which brings to life the best practices: excellent detail, low noise, wide dynamic range.

And, if you belong to the Nikonist cohort and can afford such a device, take it. You are unlikely to be disappointed. The camera will allow you to perform the entire range of tasks quickly and efficiently. And given that the price tag for it now starts at $ 1,700 on the Ukrainian Internet, this is an excellent upgrade of equipment. Although, if you have a Nikon D600, then you definitely shouldn't upgrade.

And yes, I hope that the rubber bands will not come off after six months of active use. Otherwise, this is another minus in the karma of the manufacturer.

Snapshot gallery

(hover your mouse over the top right corner to view full screen)

Full-frame cameras have always been the preserve of professionals, but with increased competition, more affordable products have appeared on the market. This does not mean that they are completely cheap. You can buy a professional full-frame camera of the previous generation or buy a new device for the same money, sacrificing some features and characteristics.

To help you make your choice, we've put together 10 cheapest full frame cameras on the market.

If you're looking to move from crop to more professional devices, this list will help you make the right choice.

1 Canon EOS 6D

This is an older camera, but it still offers an excellent set of features and high image quality.

• Type: DSLR
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 20.2MP
• Lens mount: Canon EF
• Screen: 3-inch fixed, 1,040,000 dots
• Viewfinder: Optic
• 5fps
• 1080p
• Price: 88 thousand rubles/body

The camera has excellent autofocus, which maintains its sensitivity even in low light. The sensor boasts excellent image quality, and there are few autofocus points. There are only 11 of them, but this is enough for most types of shooting. Also, the camera cannot boast of a rich set of video recording functions.

At the moment Canon release EOS 6D was the lightest digital reflex camera in the world with a full frame sensor. Even though it's over five years old, it's still enticing to landscape photographers and travelers alike. The EOS 6D's 11-point AF system includes only one cross-type sensor. It is simpler than 39-point Nikon system D610. The sensor with a resolution of 20.2MP also suffers from claims, since this resolution is not enough in 2017. However, the EOS 6D has a lot of positives and if you don't normally print your shots on a large format or do a lot of cropping, the camera will meet most requirements. EOS 6D has built-in Wi-Fi and GPS, and boasts a highly sensitive focusing system

2 Canon EOS 6D Mark II

More new model Canon EOS 6D Mark II received a more sophisticated autofocus system and a touch screen.

• Type: DSLR
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 26.2MP
• Lens mount: Canon EF
• Screen: 3-inch vari-angle touchscreen 1,040,000 dots
• Viewfinder: Optic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 5fps
• Maximum video resolution: 1080p
• Price: 125 thousand rubles/body

The autofocus system has become more modern. The swivel touch screen makes it easy to operate, but the camera doesn't have modern 4K video resolution. The camera also lacks a high dynamic range.

Arriving five years after the original Canon EOS 6D, the new version of the EOS 6D Mark II has received significant upgrades over the old model. Sensor resolution has increased significantly. Now it is 26.2MP instead of 20.2MP. Canon's DIGIC 7 processor helped with the higher resolution. For video filming, a rotary touch screen will be convenient. The camera also offers 5-axis digital stabilization for video shooting, but only at resolutions up to Full HD. 4K in the camera is not. The autofocus system has also been improved. Now it has 45 cross-type points, 27 of which have sensitivity at f / 8. The system is sensitive down to -3EV. Also an added bonus is Dual Pixel focusing, which is able to work at incredible speed in Live View and when shooting video. It's a great camera, but the EOS 6D Mark II doesn't have the best dynamic range compared to its peers.

3 Nikon D610

Affordable full-frame camera with excellent performance.

• Type: DSLR
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 24.3MP
• Lens mount: Nikon F
• Screen: 2-inch, fixed, 921,000 dots
• Viewfinder: Optic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 6fps
• Maximum video resolution: 1080p
• Price: 89 thousand rubles/body

The dual SD card slot and waterproofing are a plus, but the AF points are too close to center. Also, the camera does not have built-in wireless technologies.

Finding differences between Nikon D610 and Nikon D600 will not be easy. Introduced a year after the 600 model, the new D610 is virtually identical to its predecessor. Increased burst shooting speed from 5.5fps to 6fps. There is also a silent shooting mode at a speed of 3 frames per second. The camera is quite attractive due to its excellent value for money. A 24.3MP image sensor is installed inside, which is closed in a waterproof case. The autofocus system has 39 points. Also attractive are the two SD card slots and the optical viewfinder, which has 100% frame coverage.

4 Nikon D750

Don't look at age. The D750 still offers good performance.

• Type: DSLR
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 24.3MP
• Lens mount: Nikon F
• Screen: 2-inch, oblique, 1,228,000 dots
• Viewfinder: Optic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 5fps
• Maximum video resolution: 1080p
• Price: 130 thousand rubles/body

The camera can offer a wide dynamic range and be easy to use thanks to the tilting touch screen. However, without 4K video, it does not meet the requirements of modern videographers. Live View mode is very slow.

The D750 is sandwiched between the more affordable D610 and the professional D810/D850 in Nikon's full frame range. This is a mid range DSLR. It borrows the characteristics of both cheaper and expensive products. Camera received top speed 1/4000 sec shutter speed and 24.3MP image sensor resolution from lower models, but 51-point autofocus is carried over from the D810. The D750's tilting touchscreen display, combined with Full HD 60fps video recording and built-in Wi-Fi, make this a compelling camera.

5 Nikon D810

High resolution becomes more accessible.

• Type: DSLR
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 36.3MP
• Lens mount: Nikon F
• Screen: 2-inch, fixed, 1,229,000 dots
• Viewfinder: Optic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 5fps
• Maximum video resolution: 1080p
• Price: 189 thousand rubles/body

The lowest light sensitivity of the camera is ISO 64, which greatly reduces the noise level. Nevertheless, the camera is already difficult to attribute to affordable devices, but for its characteristics, its cost is quite pleasant. Due to the resolution, the file sizes are very large.

The more expensive Nikon D850 has already been introduced, but the previous model, the D810, has become more affordable thanks to this, although it will still cost you a tidy sum. The high resolution of 36.3MP in the D810 allows you to capture the sharpest and most detailed shots thanks to the absence of an anti-aliasing filter.

The EXPEED 4 image processor gives you the ability to shoot at 5 frames per second at full resolution. The maximum video resolution is 1080p, and the base sensitivity of ISO 64 makes it possible to shoot with minimal noise. Files with such a high resolution require a powerful computer to process.

6 Nikon Df

A convincing combination of style and content.

• Type: DSLR
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 16.2MP
• Lens mount: Nikon F
• Screen: 3.2-inch, fixed, 921,000 dots
• Viewfinder: Optic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 5fps
• Maximum video resolution: Not
• Price: 165 thousand rubles/body

The sensor produces excellent results. The camera has a stylish retro design, but it doesn't offer video recording capabilities, and the 16.2MP resolution is a little behind today's requirements.

Against the whopping 50.6MP or 45.7MP full-frame Canon 5DS/R resolutions of the Nikon D850, the 16.2MP resolution of the Nikon Df seems paltry. But the sensor of this camera has its own history. It was used in the former Nikon D4 flagship. Also, the comparatively low pixel count means that the camera will be able to produce excellent results in the dark. However, the most notable is the camera on the outside. It has a retro design. The layout of the controls will please those who love the process of shooting as much as the end result.

Compared to other Nikon FX DSLRs, the price of the Df remains consistently high, especially considering the specs, but at least you can enjoy the aesthetics of this camera.

7 Sony A7

One of the best full-frame mirrorless cameras of its time has become available to a wider range of photographers.

• Type: mirrorless camera
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 24.3MP
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Screen:
• Viewfinder: Electronic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 5fps
• Maximum video resolution: 1080p
• Price: 85 thousand rubles/body

The camera is a good size. He is not too big. The image quality is also impressive. At the same time, like most mirrorless cameras, the Sony A7 has a weak battery. Another downside is the lack of 4K video recording.

Compared to huge DSLRs, the Sony A7 is very small and light. Obviously, once you attach a telephoto lens to the camera, the size and weight increase significantly, minimizing the benefits of the A7. The Sony A7 was the first full-frame compact mirrorless camera on the market, and while it lacks some competitive advantages such as touch screen functionality and 4K video, the quality of RAW images captured with the 24.3MP CMOS Exmor sensor continues to amaze. The only real disappointment is the somewhat modest battery life, relatively low price A7 allows you to stock up on spare batteries.

8 Sony A7 II

Although the interior of the A7 II is similar to its predecessor, the image processing has been improved resulting in better results.

• Type: mirrorless camera
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 24.3MP
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Screen: 3-inch, oblique, 1,228,800 dots
• Viewfinder: Electronic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 5fps
• Maximum video resolution: 1080p
• Price: 105 thousand rubles/body

The advantage was 5-axis image stabilization based on image sensor shift. The image processing has also improved. Otherwise, the camera remained similar to the previous A7 model. Optics big size still negates almost all the advantages of a small camera body.

9 Sony A7S

Video heavyweight in 4K resolution. The Sony A7S is a mirrorless camera for those who know what it's capable of and can take advantage of it.

• Type: mirrorless camera
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 12.2MP
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Screen: 3-inch, oblique, 921,600 dots
• Viewfinder: Electronic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 5fps
• Maximum video resolution: 4K
• Price: 120 thousand rubles/body

Incredible low-light performance and the ability to shoot uncompressed 4K video with an external recording device are very good features. At the same time, the camera has a very low resolution and cannot independently record 4K on a memory card.

The 12.2MP resolution may seem like a throwback to a long time ago, but the full-frame sensor inside the Sony A7S practically glows in the dark. "S" stands for "sensitivity" (sensitivity), and for good reason. The A7S has a native ISO range of 100-102400, and keeping the resolution low allows each pixel to be larger for better light gathering properties. This minimizes noise and delivers exceptional image quality. Progressive video settings offer the option of using a flat S-log2 color profile. There is an HDMI connector on the case, which can output video to an external device in 4K resolution. Only the A7S II camera received the ability to save 4K video to a memory card. If shooting photos and videos in low light is your priority, then the A7S is the one for you. a good option. Otherwise, the A7 II with higher resolution and stabilization wins.

10 Pentax K-1

Do you want to stand out from the crowd? The full-frame Pentax DSLR offers a new experience.

• Type: DSLR
• Sensor: full frame
• Permission: 36.4MP
• Lens mount: Pentax K
• Screen: 2-inch, oblique, 1,037,000 dots
• Viewfinder: Optic
• Maximum Burst Speed: 5fps
• Maximum video resolution: 1080p
• Price: 135 thousand rubles/body

The camera has built-in image stabilization based on sensor shift. At the same time, the sluggish autofocus system and the lack of 4K video are upsetting.

Ricoh doesn't provide a great selection of full frame cameras, but the company knows how to make quality devices. The K-1 is a camera that stands out from the crowd with its 5-axis anti-shake technology with 5 stops of shake compensation. There is also Pixel Shift, which will increase the resolution of pictures by shooting multiple frames with a sensor shift of 1 pixel. Also very interesting is the Astrotracer system, which uses GPS data to move the sensor to follow the movement of the stars in the sky when shooting with long exposures to get the best sharpness. At 36.4MP, the K-1 is similar to the Nikon D810. It also does not have an anti-aliasing filter. The Pentax K-1 offers great value for money, so if you're looking for full-frame sensor resolution, stabilization and excellent image quality, and are less concerned about autofocus speed, then the K-1 should be a great deal for you.